Archive

Archive for the ‘Nieman Lab Predictions’ Category
15 Dec

We’ll draw the lines we will not cross

Comments off

Nieman Lab. Predictions for Journalism, 2025
https://www.niemanlab.org/2024/12/well-draw-the-lines-we-will-not-cross/

In the past, I’ve made predictions about emerging tech or, like last year, predicted the painful shortcomings of our industry leaders. (I’m sorry that one keeps coming true.)

This year, I could predict that Bluesky will successfully emerge as the new social media platform of choice for news/media friends and junkies. (Follow me here.)

Or I could predict, rather reliably, that an AI “news” product will fail miserably and continue to reveal the tech’s inability to match the (grifter) hype. (I fully believe in the tech, just not the vendors who are selling it to uninformed leaders hungry for an easy answer to address their ongoing shortcomings.)

Or that an owner of a news org will choose to appease the president-elect in order to advance their personal financial self-interest. Or, hell, all three at once.

But this year, I predict that you — yes, you — will stand up, speak up, and do the right thing for the communities we aim to serve, including many who either are or will be under attack by the incoming administration.

I predict that you — possibly in a small conference room with just a handful of colleagues, or in a one-on-one meeting with your boss, or on a stage in front of a large audience, or most likely through an email — will realize that this is the moment you can’t stay silent and must finally speak up.

Trans people are human beings. Immigrants are human beings. Palestinians are human beings.

Women’s rights are human rights. A lie is a lie, not an alternative fact. Racism is racism, not “racially tinged.”

Not all stories have two sides. And some that do do not have equal weighted sides. There are going to be so many of these big moments, so be prepared.

Before the start of the new year, I want you to write down and remember: What are your values? What do you stand for now…before it gets any tougher? Are you willing to speak up? Are you willing to quit your job? Are you willing to put your safety on the line for those values?

I don’t pretend to know where each of us will draw the line — but I believe that we each have a line that we will not cross and where we can no longer stay silent.

And while many of us have the luxury of time to contemplate where our line may or may not be, many, many others do not. They have been harassed. They have been attacked. They have been killed. This is not an exercise of “what ifs” — it’s a reality of “what now.”

And I have faith that you — yes, you — will stand up to meet the moment to give a full-throated answer to whatever tough question this new reality will bring you.

The time has come to speak up for what you think is right. Don’t let our communities — especially the vulnerable ones that are current being attacked and dehumanized — down. Don’t let me down. More importantly, don’t let yourself down.

14 Dec

The wrong people will be laid off…again

Comments off

Nieman Lab. Predictions for Journalism, 2024
https://www.niemanlab.org/2023/12/the-wrong-people-will-be-laid-off-again/

My entire career, I have attempted to push our newsrooms’ cultures to embrace new technologies, new opportunities, and new realities in our industry. I’ve written some past predictions about this work here too. But, as we enter a new year, it is time to admit that embracing these disruptions in our newsrooms is no longer the largest obstacle we face.

There are countless examples of how — despite not having appropriate resources — journalists have done more with less and succeeded in producing quality products across the growing landscape of modern journalism. Whether it is newsletters, podcasts, social media, or live events, journalists have not only embraced these new forms, they’ve elevated journalism and brought in new audiences.

What has continued to fail is the leadership and executives running the business. They fail to monetize these successful new news products, while other content producers seem to make money.

Journalists are not the problem. Editorial management (a.k.a. newsroom leadership) is no longer the problem — mainly because they’ve retired or, sorry to be blunt, died and more modern leadership has taken over. Culture to embrace our digital/modern reality is not the biggest problem. Everyone gets it.

Despite producing award-winning, audience-attracting news products, our business side executives have failed to lead and find ways to monetize them.

Yet when layoffs come, those who sold us the false business ideas of “pivot to video” or “get me their emails” or “put on live events” or “we need new podcasts” or “let’s get IP to sell to Netflix” aren’t the ones paying the layoff price. We’ve all seen many of these leaders not only stay but get promoted — and in some cases be the authors of the memos announcing newsroom cuts.

I am not saying they’re our enemies. Far from it. For any news organization to succeed, we need to be partners, collaborating as we find innovative solutions to sustain our journalism and serve our community. Whether you are a journalist or a money person, that is the sole mission — either get on board or get out. And there are examples of this in both local and national markets.

What I’m saying is it’s time to hold our business executives accountable. Look at your direct boss — chances are they aren’t making the business decisions, just putting them into practice. They may tell you we need a TikTok presence or it’s time to leave X for Bluesky (I have codes, btw), but they don’t have a clue how these new products will be converted into revenue.

But you do it anyway — and you do it well.

Now think of your boss’s boss…or even their boss. If they aren’t charged with finding revenue, they have a colleague on the business side, and these are the people who are suppose to bring us to modern financial stability.

How often do these executives face consequences, like a general assignment reporter in the newsroom? Chances are they’ve gotten bonuses and raises, while newsrooms fight for better pay. Chances are they’re currently laying off people in the name of AI — and when they mishandle that technology, they’ll pivot to the next thing, not facing consequences.

Chances are they have left a gutted organization and are (somehow) raising millions for a new news startup — which, based on their track record, will fail and lead to more layoffs.

I’m not naive enough to think that this prediction is going to have them face their shortcomings, or that there aren’t a few executives doing the best they can. Yes, yes, yes — hedge funds are a huge problem. No doubt.

But if there is a news org that is genuinely trying to produce a viable product, then there had better be business leadership that delivers — or gets replaced if it doesn’t.

And when someone asks you to launch a new news product, you better be proactive and hands-on working with the business side collaboratively, finding ways to monetize it.

If we have a dedicated journalist to produce a successful newsletter, then we need them to have a dedicated business person to monetize it. And their challenge needs to be to fund their salaries and bring additional revenue into the newsroom budget.

Everyone needs to roll up their sleeves to produce and fund journalism. If making money off journalism is your job, deliver or step aside. If they aren’t held accountable, the wrong people will be laid off again.

Categories: Nieman Lab Predictions Tags:
13 Dec

What the next generation of journalists thinks

Comments off

Nieman Lab. Predictions for Journalism, 2022
https://www.niemanlab.org/2021/12/what-the-next-generation-of-journalists-thinks/

This past semester, I taught my JOUR 323: Journalism and The Audience class at USC Annenberg. The user-focused course is mostly seniors with a few juniors, all of whom strategically launch a semester-long product to serve a particular audience or demographic.

As part of the class, we read and discussed one of last year’s Nieman Lab predictions each week.

It seems fitting that this year I turn my prediction over to them. Here’s what a few soon-to-be-graduating journalists predict will happen in the coming year.

Julia Barton, Class of 2022

“The impending climate crisis is arguably the most pressing issue of the 21st century, developing in tandem with a growing distrust in the media and political polarization in the United States, causing climate journalism to be met with undue skepticism, critique, and partisanship. In a time where information is abundant but facts are scarce, a journalist’s responsibility to serve their audience with objectivity has become notably more difficult, yet successful climate reporting is vital to combatting the climate crisis. As such, there is a dire need for a framework to guide journalists through the hefty and invaluable task of effectively reporting on climate topics so as to move toward solutions rather than fear and distrust.

“To improve the quality of reporting that goes into climate topics, journalists should have more than a basic understanding of climate, even if environmental coverage is outside of their beat. It can be argued that climate has ties to nearly any beat, and having the skills and knowledge to add a climate angle to a story not focused on climate change may be wildly beneficial for readers. Once newsrooms have established trust in climate facts internally, it becomes easier for those crucial facts to be established among our audiences. With this foundation, climate reporting can move in the direction of solutions journalism rather than constantly repeating the droning and upsetting general idea that we are in a climate crisis. We owe it to our readers and to ourselves to accurately report on climate–mother nature doesn’t discriminate.”

Jillian Carmenate, Class of 2022

“As the new generation of journalists enters the industry, journalism will become more meaningful and impactful. Journalists will intentionally connect with their audiences and tailor their content to better inform them. In addition, journalists will better serve audiences because they will report on the issues that are impacting their communities. As a journalism student, my classmates give me hope for the future of journalism because they are passionate about examining social and systemic issues with in-depth reporting.”

Annalysa Cowie, Class of 2022

“The Covid-19 pandemic really changed how the journalism industry worked. The biggest area impacted by the pandemic was the newsroom environment. Having to do your reporting from home and things turning completely digital was a big shift for everyone. A lot of editors and people who ran newsrooms before the pandemic were mainly Gen-X’s. When the immediate shift came to being online, the people who ran newsrooms were completely lost on how to navigate and report from their own homes. It allowed for millennials and Gen Z’s to truly shine in the newsroom and take over because of their digital presence and knowledge.

“I think we will continue to see a big shift in who runs newsrooms. While the pandemic had already motivated the older generations to take a step down and allow the millennials to take over how they are run, I think 2022 will continue this trend. While on the topic of being digital, I think we will continue to see newsrooms remain digital this upcoming year. Journalists have adjusted to doing their work from their own homes rather than going into a crowded office. Messaging apps like Slack have become the easiest way for newsrooms to function and I think they will remain that way. Lastly, people have completely swept the idea of physical newspapers and magazines under the rug and would rather prefer to have something at their reach at all times through their phones. While many large news companies have started to require a paywall to read their content, I think we will start to see smaller news companies require them as well.”

Julia Lin, Class of 2023

“The future of journalism doesn’t just meet the audience where they are at, it invites them in and knows them by name. It’s not just remembering that our audiences are people. For journalism to be personal, journalists must be allowed to be people too. In every sense of the word. Journalism that is personal convinces audiences they should care, it humanizes stories, and it acknowledges that every journalist, every editor and every reader everywhere shows up with an identity that can’t be checked at the door no matter how much we pretend. And it also means that journalists can be people in the newsroom too. That we write with voice, we take breaks and that we have, yes, boundaries.”

Maggie Morris, Class of 2021

“I believe that the journalism industry is going to make a noticeable shift toward casual reporting to engage younger audiences. Generally speaking, younger generations who are active in social media tend to watch media that provides some sort of relatability. Reporters who aren’t polished with perfect camera setups aren’t always going to grab a viewer’s attention, so I believe journalism is going to get creative in how they grab attention.”

Sophia Ungaro, Class of 2021

“In 2022 I hope we embrace the end of objectivity. While it may always be a requirement for journalists to maintain a certain level of professionalism and follow an ethical standard, it is absurd to ask that they erase facets of their identity to report accurately.

“Being subjective to certain matters allows for more substantial reporting and higher community engagement. Leveraging your human experience to connect with sources is a method to create trust within the community you serve as a reporter.

“When journalism begins to accept the death of objectivity, the industry will begin to thrive off relying on organic humanity rather than stiff, rigid and outdated mechanisms.”

Pauline Woodley, Class of 2022

“My perfect newsroom looks like me and my friends, it is run on compassion and care for all involved. It is fair and unafraid to do what is right. It is perfect in its imperfections, in the fact that we are going to get it wrong and we are going to admit are humanity when we do. It is having a voice that is distinctly yours and being able to share it. Being bold in speaking out against injustices. I’ve learned, of my time in college, that the only way I’m moving up in this industry is by lifting and being lifted.

“The most successful moments in my student-run newsroom have been filled with marginalized journalists getting to tell their own stories. We are journalists dedicated to telling the stories we were never told. In finding the gaps and filling them. This year more than ever I learned how important it is for people to have the space to speak for themselves. I work as a member of the Equity Board in my student-run newsroom. Our version of a diversity and inclusion section was sparked by the horrid events of 2020 and was always necessary. In navigating a return to in-person classes and a multimedia newsroom that had remained empty for a year and a half, I learned how important it is to uplift and build community rather than try and take center stage.

“The future of the media is in solidarity, specifically amongst journalists of color. In the last year especially there has been a need for fostering community. In a college newsroom at a predominantly white university, that looks like friendships formed with authentic intent. In our bubbles, we are heard and seen. It is much easier to raise our voice and fight for what’s right when we form friendships in the newsroom that have our back. Change comes with disruption, and the journalists of color, the marginalized journalists chatting by the water cooler are more than ready to disrupt.”

Robert Hernandez, Class of 2001

“I’m going to sneak in my prediction too: Old journalism will be swept away and replaced by newer, younger, more diverse journalism that looks like my students…the city we live in, Los Angeles…the state of California…the genuine melting pot of the United States. These young professionals are tired of waiting for their turn and will take the reins of leadership whether older generations are ready or not.

“I encourage you to hire them. But I also encourage the industry to embrace them, because these young professionals are going to be our bosses that will be in the position to hire us.

“Their time is now.”

Robert Hernandez is a professor of professional practice at the USC Annenberg School for Communication and Journalism.

Categories: Nieman Lab Predictions Tags:
15 Dec

Data and shame

Comments off

Nieman Lab. Predictions for Journalism, 2021
https://www.niemanlab.org/2020/12/data-and-shame/

It was a different time, the early 2000s. Among the largest and most influential media companies was Knight Ridder — a company many journalists today either don’t know or barely remember.

But some things remain the same. The lack of diversity in newsrooms was a huge, shameful problem — same as today.

Sure, Knight Ridder was famous as a digital innovator — for having the San Jose Mercury News be among the first papers to go online, even launching Mercury Center on AOL back in 1993. But for me one of their biggest innovations was toward the end of its corporate life: a program developed in partnership with the National Association of Hispanic Journalists.

(NAHJ has always been an innovator, too. They were the first ones to create student newsrooms at annual conferences and now leads a freelance-based publication to pay its members to produce journalism, palabra. Not only getting a seat at the table, but building their own table.)

The program I’m talking about debuted in 2003 and I want to see it return. The Parity Project was an investment and a commitment by participating newspapers to strive for a diverse newsroom that reflected the audience it was aiming to serve. It had other elements, like a community-based advisory board, but it was the commitment to diversity based on population data that was key for me.

The Parity Project was based on two things that were around back then and are even more influential now: data and shame. Those are the two things I predict 2021 will bring.

Yes, of course, news orgs that claim a commitment to diversity will continue to publish questionable pieces encouraging military responses to protestors or attacking women for wanting to be called “Doctor”; they’ll continue to hire White males for leadership positions rather than taking the opportunity to hire a qualified candidate of color; they’ll create fellowships that put journalists of color on limited contracts, while outright hiring others with the same experience at entry-level positions; they’ll continue to avoid dealing with their problematic staffer who writes racist, sexist, homophobic, ignorant columns or tweets. (Maybe they’re waiting the staffer to jump to Substack.) I could go on — and that would be the safest prediction to make (though, of course, I’d love to be proved wrong).

But unlike the past, 2021 will also bring a new level of appreciation for data and shame.

At great risk to their careers, we’ve seen journalists rise up and speak out to hold their employer accountable. That’s not new, per se — but to do it on social media, creating shame at an industry level and even building a national awareness is new.

Here at USC, there is an Instagram account called black_at_usc. It’s been a minute since it published, but the collection of anonymous stories amplifying the everyday racism — whether microaggressions or larger issues — offered data and shame. And it was effective. Deans and the university president noticed the account and were forced to address it, prompting changes.

This will happen more. It should happen more. And it will happen across many industries. There is plenty of data, and plenty of shame.

As in the past, leadership will make promises about how this time, this reckoning, is different. And yeah, like you, I have my doubts.

That’s where data and shame come in. Not only do we need to harness data and shame to hold newly elected politicians or those involved in the vaccine deployment accountable — we need to use it to hold ourselves accountable.

Here is what you can do now: Measure the demographics of the audience your organization is aiming to serve and put them up against the demographics of your newsroom. Print it out and hang it up through the newsroom — hell, use it as your Zoom background.

Raise awareness of our shortcomings via data. And shame leadership if they don’t do something about it. And hold leadership accountable when they promise to do something about it, but don’t. Data and shame.

Let’s take a moment to acknowledge that there is a portion of the population that will ignore the data and apparently has no shame. They are a loud and troublesome portion — but they are, in fact, the minority. Chances are your colleagues, your bosses, and your employers aren’t among that fringe group.

But if they are, you know what to do: data and shame.

Categories: Nieman Lab Predictions Tags:
10 Dec

Racists and sexists get replaced

Comments off

Nieman Lab. Predictions for Journalism, 2019
https://www.niemanlab.org/2018/12/racists-and-sexists-get-replaced/

Whether you’re carrying tiki torches or saying “we just can’t find qualified women or people of color,” we see you. And we will replace you.

If you have said something racist, sexist, homophobic, xenophobic in a professional setting — whether being at work, an industry event or listserv — but don’t see it as a big deal…we see you. And we will replace you.

If you keep confusing the two black interns’ names or the two Asian reporters’ names, especially when you congratulate (the wrong) one for their work…we see you. And we will replace you.

If you think the only way to diversify your staff is through fellowships that underpay the employee — while they do equal work, under a contract of one, two, or three years — with the false promise of maybe hiring them full-time at the end, we see you…and we will replace you.

If you have said, “Well, we have one woman on this panel” (chances are she’s the moderator) and think that’s enough…if you said, “Hey, we did good, we have 30 percent women speakers. That should be enough”…we see you. And we will replace you.

“They get too much coverage.” “We have too many already.” “How many is enough?” “We’ll look into it.” “Why do they get special treatment?” “They should be happy just being here.” “Why can’t they take a joke?”

We see you. And we will replace you.

There is an unstoppable wave of talented, diverse people that believe in the value of inclusion that is about to crash down on our industry — every industry.

We have played by your rules. Gone to your schools. Done your internships and fellowships. Applied for jobs. Asked for promotions. Waited in line, waited for our turn…only to be passed over and ignored.

Instead of letting you burn us out and following the many that left this industry, this wave has decided to drown you out.

We know that to succeed we have to play by our own rules. Rules that don’t change for “a better fit” and are based on the same core values that define us all as journalists.

We have become allies. We have become partners. Mentors. Influencers. Entrepreneurs, starting our own organizations. Leaders — in classrooms, newsrooms, and boardrooms.

If you haven’t heard of this wave, be warned. Either join us for parity and inclusivity or get out the way.

Now, if you’re offended by this, take a moment to reflect.

I didn’t call you out. You just did.

And we will replace you.

Categories: Nieman Lab Predictions Tags:
15 Dec

History will exclude you, again

Comments off

Nieman Lab. Predictions for Journalism, 2017
https://www.niemanlab.org/2016/12/history-will-exclude-you/

If you follow me on social media, or have read my past predictions, you know that I fully believe we’re heading toward the next disruption: immersive journalism.

I am proud to say last year’s prediction — which included news organizations partnering up with academic institutions to produce immersive journalism — came true with a collaboration between ProPublica, The Texas Tribune, and USC Annenberg.

My students, under the brand JOVRNALISM, converted their powerful Hell and High Water investigation into an immersive experience called Hell and High Water VR (best viewed via our iOS and Android apps). We’re also collaborating on different projects with CIR/Reveal News, The Desert Sun and many others — stay tuned!

But this time around I want to make a slightly different prediction: If we — the diverse community driving this emerging platform — aren’t proactive, VR, augmented reality, and other immersive forms will become dominated and defined by white males.

Nothing personal against my white male colleagues, but the exclusionary narrative that dominates the history of technology is both constant and untrue. Every aspect of technology has been also influenced by women and people of color — but somehow they get left out of the narrative and excluded from leadership roles.

VR has especially been shaped by women and people of color, and, yes, by white men too. Honestly, this is a collaborative and diverse community. It’s a beautiful thing to be a part of. But I’m seeing the return to that exclusionary narrative in this space.

Last week, a VR summit had 96 speakers — only 10 were women.

TEN. (That’s up from last year, I am told, when they had 60 speakers and only one woman.)

I don’t mean to pick on them, and I am sure they will do better next year. But this isn’t the first conference that has done this recently — there’s a history of exclusion in journalism conferences too — and we all know this won’t be the last.

For the record, I don’t think this is a conscious, strategic effort to exclude, but regardless of the reason it cannot happen again. So, I’m asking people to speak up.

I am asking you to speak up.

If you are organizing a conference, make sure half your speakers are women and at least a third of the speakers are of color. Diversity goes far beyond those two demographics as well: sexual orientation, geography, religious, political, and more.

If you’re on a panel that is all men or doesn’t reflect the diverse community, speak up. You have to point it out — before, during, and even after your session.

If you are a member of an underrepresented community and are invited to present but can’t attend, let’s find you a diverse replacement rather than forfeiting that rare and valuable invitation.

Look, whether you want to admit it or not, there is an incredible power and responsibility when you are a presenter at a conference. Standing on stage and presenting, you are an industry expert and influencer. You are defining and shaping the industry. If you aren’t up there, you are just another face in the audience looking up to leaders.

Immersive journalism is happening. That’s not a prediction, it’s a reality. And if we want this to go mainstream, excluding half the population is a bad business move.

Don’t complain after the fact, either. Don’t roll your eyes and pick apart this post. Do something.

You can join the two Women in VR organizations proactively trying to influence the conversation. You can join the countless other groups discussing this medium.

This technology is accessible to everyone, including you. So get on it.

And join the diverse community that looks more like my JOVRNALISM classroom:

My students and I produce JOVRNALISM thanks to Nonny de la Peña, Christina Heller, Thomas Wallner, Julie Young, Brian Chirls, Ray Soto, Sarah Hill, and many others. We wouldn’t be here if it weren’t for them. This whole industry wouldn’t.

Categories: Nieman Lab Predictions Tags: